The movie ‘Lives of others’ was brilliant in its depiction
of life in East Germany under the watchful eyes of Stasi, the dreaded and
repressive state police. These guys collected information about people whom
they suspected of having anti-state (or ‘pro decadent West’) leanings in an
almost obsessive compulsive way. Every aspect of the ‘suspect’s’ life was
covered. At the height of Cold War, Stasi probably spied on more than a third
of the population and collected astonishing amounts of information and data about them. But none of the information and data could prevent this from
happening.
(via)
Emotion trumps data, any day. And emotions cannot be
predicted. Behaviour, linked to emotions, even more so.
But brands don’t seem to believe in this. They are going to
town with their ‘investments’ in big data and analytics. They probably see in
data and analytics the answer to all the problems the brand is facing, a holy
grail. Data is something absolute and finite. It gives the marketer a sense of
control, a sense of being ‘scientific’ in their decision making. It also helps
them justify any decision, more often than not, the wrong one. And their favorite
game, Analysis-Paralysis, gets even better with big data.
But big data can also give interesting insights leading to interesting stories if one knew where to look. But I doubt very much whether
that will happen. Maybe, they should
look at this interesting case for small data.
Robert Campbell in his usual irrepressible style urges brands not to become data fashion victims. He says,
“We have jumped on the data bandwagon to such an extent that
we’ve seemingly forgotten how normal human beings respond to stuff.
Instead of using the findings and learning’s of data to
create stories that have emotional value and meaning to our audience, we are
now seeing more and more ads that basically regurgitate the data as the actual
message.”
The tech industry which made big data fashionable has also
been a victim to its distracting powers.
One of the most loved brands of the dotcom era Yahoo is now
on life support. One of the reasons for this sorry plight was their
over-fascination with big data (and analytics) through their investment in Hadoop. This obsession with data meant that their attention was diverted from
doing what is fundamental to their business – creating a wonderful user
experience.
Google, the tech giant, prides itself on data-based decision
making as one of its cornerstone of its strategy. Can someone explain to me why then are they tripping almost everywhere except in their bread and butter,
Search? Be it the buyout of Motorola or their ‘Facebook’ obsession product
Google Plus, Google seems to be losing their mojo. I hope they do not wind up
like Yahoo.
Therefore, it is not surprising to see comments like the one
below on a recently held conference on big data involving the usual suspects.
All the data in the world won't fix the (banner) ad nobody sees Global Brands Talk Big Data, Big Problems shar.es/cvfUj via @adweek
— Tarik Sedky (@tariksed) October 22, 2012
Lastly, one of the biggest names in the telecom world
continues to sink faster than a guy with cement shoes in water while their
investments in big data and analytics continues to grow. The only solution to
their plight is ‘Change’, beginning with the management. But then data and
analytics cannot help in that. It requires something that is rarely used these
days. It is called common sense.
